Industries
Business Distribution by Industry in Penol
| Industry Description | Number of Establishments |
|---|---|
| Unreachable | 5 |
Penol Facts
| Area | 12.1 km² |
| Population | 448 |
| Male Population | 215 (48.0%) |
| Female Population | 233 (52.0%) |
| Population change (1975 to 2020) | +68.4% |
| Population change (2000 to 2020) | +30.6% |
| Median Age | 43 years (Male: 43.2, Female: 42.7) |
| GDP per capita (PPP) | $44,157 (2022) |
| Local Time | |
| Timezone | Central European Summer Time |
| Lat & Lng | 45.39070, 5.19296 |
Map of Penol
Interactive Map
Penol Population
Years 1975 to 2030
| Data | 1975 | 1990 | 2000 | 2015 | 2020 | 2025* | 2030* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Population | 266 | 308 | 343 | 401 | 448 | 463 | 486 |
| Population Density | 21.9 / km² | 25.4 / km² | 28.3 / km² | 33.1 / km² | 36.9 / km² | 38.2 / km² | 40.1 / km² |
* Projected
Sources: JRC (European Commission's Joint Research Centre) work on the GHS built-up gridPenol Population change from 2000 to 2020
Increase of 30.6% from year 2000 to 2020
| Location | Change since 1975 | Change since 1990 | Change since 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Penol | +68.4% | +45.5% | +30.6% |
| France | — | — | — |
Sources: JRC (European Commission's Joint Research Centre) work on the GHS built-up grid
Penol Median Age
Median Age: 43 years
| Location | Median Age | Median Age (Female) | Median Age (Male) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Penol | 43 yrs | 42.7 yrs | 43.2 yrs |
| France | 39.6 yrs | 41 yrs | 38.1 yrs |
Sources: CIESIN (Center for International Earth Science Information Network)
Penol Population Density
Population Density: 36.9 / km²
| Location | Population | Area | Density |
|---|---|---|---|
| Penol | 448 | 12.1 km² | 36.9 / km² |
| France | 65.9 million | 638,022.5 km² | 103 / km² |
Sources: JRC (European Commission's Joint Research Centre) work on the GHS built-up grid
Penol Historical and Projected Population
Estimated Population from 0 to 2100
Sources:
- JRC (European Commission's Joint Research Centre) work on the GHS built-up grid
- CIESIN (Center for International Earth Science Information Network)
- [Link] Klein Goldewijk, K., Beusen, A., Doelman, J., and Stehfest, E.: Anthropogenic land use estimates for the Holocene – HYDE 3.2, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 9, 927–953, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-927-2017, 2017.
Area Codes
Percentage Area Codes used by businesses in Penol
Human Development Index (HDI)
Statistic composite index of life expectancy, education, and per capita income.
Source: [Link] Kummu, M., Taka, M. &Guillaume, J. Gridded global datasets for Gross Domestic Product and Human Development Index over 1990–2015. Sci Data 5, 180004 (2018) doi:10.1038/sdata.2018.4
Penol Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
GDP per capita, PPP (constant 2017 international $)
| Data | 1990 | 1995 | 2000 | 2005 | 2010 | 2015 | 2020 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDP per capita | $34,255 | $35,617 | $40,228 | $40,759 | $41,151 | $40,614 | $40,763 | $44,157 |
| Total GDP | $64.9M | $72.2M | $87.8M | $97M | $107M | $112.8M | $120.2M | $132.2M |
Source: [Link] Kummu, M., Kosonen, M. & Masoumzadeh Sayyar, S. Downscaled gridded global dataset for gross domestic product (GDP) per capita PPP over 1990–2022. Sci Data 12, 178 (2025) doi:10.1038/s41597-025-04487-x
Penol CO2 Emissions
Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions Per Capita in Tonnes Per Year
| Location | CO2 Emissions | CO2 Emissions Per Capita | CO2 Emissions Intensity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Penol | 3,543 tn | 7.91 tn | 292.2 tons/km² |
| France | 485,797,691 tn | 7.38 tn | 761.4 tons/km² |
Sources: [Link] Moran, D., Kanemoto K; Jiborn, M., Wood, R., Többen, J., and Seto, K.C. (2018) Carbon footprints of 13,000 cities. Environmental Research Letters DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aac72a
Penol CO2 Emissions
| 2013 CO2 emissions (tonnes/year) | 3,543 tn |
| 2013 CO2 emissions (tonnes/year) per capita | 7.91 tn |
| 2013 CO2 emissions intensity (tonnes/km²/year) | 292.2 tons/km² |
Natural Hazards Risk
Relative risk out of 10
| Hazard | Risk Level |
|---|---|
| Flood | High (10) |
| Earthquake | Low (2) |
* Risk, particularly concerning flood or landslide, may not be for the entire area.
Sources:
- Dilley, M., R.S. Chen, U. Deichmann, A.L. Lerner-Lam, M. Arnold, J. Agwe, P. Buys, O. Kjekstad, B. Lyon, and G. Yetman. 2005. Natural Disaster Hotspots: A Global Risk Analysis. Washington, D.C.: World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/0-8213-5930-4.
- Center for Hazards and Risk Research - CHRR - Columbia University, Center for International Earth Science Information Network - CIESIN - Columbia University. 2005. Global Flood Hazard Frequency and Distribution. Palisades, NY: NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC). https://doi.org/10.7927/H4668B3D.
- Center for Hazards and Risk Research - CHRR - Columbia University, Center for International Earth Science Information Network - CIESIN - Columbia University. 2005. Global Earthquake Hazard Distribution - Peak Ground Acceleration. Palisades, NY: NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC). https://doi.org/10.7927/H4BZ63ZS.
Recent Nearby Earthquakes
Magnitude 3.0 and greater
| Date▼ | Time↕ | Magnitude↕ | Distance↕ | Depth↕ | Location↕ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/17/17 | 12:10 PM | 3.2 | 89.3 km | 5,000 m | 10km SSE of Aiton, France | usgs.gov |
| 4/6/13 | 8:49 PM | 3.4 | 88.9 km | 2,000 m | 1km SSW of Poisy, France | usgs.gov |
| 1/5/08 | 3:08 AM | 3 | 30.9 km | 2,000 m | France | usgs.gov |
| 7/9/07 | 10:24 PM | 3.1 | 37 km | 3,000 m | France | usgs.gov |
| 6/30/06 | 12:34 AM | 3 | 87 km | 5,000 m | France | usgs.gov |
| 1/11/06 | 10:32 AM | 4.1 | 63 km | 5,000 m | France | usgs.gov |
| 11/5/05 | 3:17 PM | 3.5 | 99.4 km | 2,000 m | France | usgs.gov |
| 10/1/05 | 11:19 PM | 3.5 | 57.8 km | 8,000 m | France | usgs.gov |
| 6/12/05 | 5:02 PM | 3 | 80.5 km | 3,000 m | France | usgs.gov |
| 9/24/04 | 7:08 AM | 3 | 40.8 km | 6,000 m | France | usgs.gov |
Source: U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)
About Our Data
The data on this page is estimated using a number of publicly available tools and resources. It is provided without warranty, and could contain inaccuracies. Use at your own risk.